We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
Operating systems software Reviews
15,491 Reviews

Windows Server 2008 review

$999 (around £500)

Manufacturer: Microsoft

Our Rating: We rate this 3 out of 5

Microsoft's long-awaited Windows Server 2008 delivers advancements in speed, security and management, but its virtualisation and network-access control features come up short.

Microsoft's long-awaited Windows Server 2008 delivers advancements in speed, security and management, but its virtualisation and network-access control features come up short. UPDATE: Windows Server 2012 review.

In our testing of Windows Server 2008 we found that Microsoft has made a number of improvements to its flagship server operating system.

For example, new server administrative role schemes boost security, the Server Manager program improves manageability, Internet Information Server (IIS) web management functionality is revamped, Active Directory is easier to control, and Windows Terminal Services has been redesigned.

Windows Server 2008 is also significantly faster than Windows Server 2003, especially when client machines are running Vista.

Unfortunately, a highly anticipated feature of Windows Server 2008, the Hyper-V server virtualisation tool, is missing. Microsoft includes a beta version of Hyper-V with Windows Server 2008 editions, but it will not release final code until the third quarter of this year.

Also missing is compatibility between non-Windows (and older Windows) clients and Microsoft's Network Access Protection (NAP) scheme, Microsoft's version of NAC.

The Microsoft NAP scheme uses client-side 'health certificates' to either give or deny clients access to the network An 'unhealthy' client is vectored to remediation servers for necessary antivirus updates or security patches (compare NAC products).

We tested the NAP scheme as implemented in Windows Server 2008 and found that it works as long as the client is running Windows XP or Vista. (See sidebar.) But it won't let clients running any other brand of operating system have access to its protected resources, thus hampering the potential success of the NAP scheme, because all client types must be vetted for NAC to work effectively.

NEXT PAGE: rethinking server roles > >

Windows Server 2008 Expert Verdict »
1 GHz (x86 processor) or 1.4 GHz (x64 processor) - an Intel Itanium 2 processor is required for Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-Based Systems
512MB RAM
10GB disk space
DVD-ROM drive
Super VGA (800 × 600) or higher resolution monitor
Keyboard and Microsoft Mouse or compatible pointing device
  • Overall: We give this item 6 of 10 overall

Windows Server 2008 is definitely faster, more manageable and secure. But it's still missing the virtual link.

There are currently no price comparisons for this product.

IDG UK Sites

Nokia Lumia 930 review: The flagship Windows Phone 8.1 smartphone

IDG UK Sites

Live Blog: Apple financial results, record June quarter, 35.2m iPhones sold, $37.4b revenue

IDG UK Sites

Welcome to the upgrade cycle - you'll never leave

IDG UK Sites

Why smartphone screens are getting bigger