We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message

Windows 7 compatible. No, really this time

Windows 7Microsoft has unveiled the details of the Windows 7 logo program. The requirements for earning the Windows 7 compatibility label are stricter this time around - partially to boost acceptance of 64bit systems, and partially to avoid the pitfalls Microsoft encountered with the Vista logo program.

The Windows 7 logo program beefs up the testing requirements, while reducing the red tape and expense it takes for partners and vendors to certify their products as compatible. Products that achieve the Windows 7 logo certification should perform optimally and experience minimal crashes, reboots or other issues.

There is a key change from past Windows compatibility programs. According to this Windows 7 blog post, "To be granted the Logo, products are tested to work with all versions of Windows 7 including 64bit. This is an important change, since 64 bit systems are becoming more mainstream."

Microsoft also claims to have engaged partners earlier in the operating system development process to ensure they had sufficient time to develop and test Windows 7-compatible products. The first of many mistakes with the launch of Windows Vista was the widespread lack of compatible drivers for critical devices such as printers.

That was just the beginning of the factors that ultimately contributed to the lack of acceptance of Windows Vista. Microsoft also has a skeleton in the closet when it comes to the certified compatible logo scheme. The Windows Vista logo program led to some major controversy and embarrassment for Microsoft.

As if there weren't enough problems launching Windows Vista, both real and perceived, Microsoft was also slapped with a lawsuit claiming that Microsoft labelled computer hardware as Vista-compatible even though the PC's were incapable of running some of the primary Windows Vista features. The marginally compatible hardware irked more than a few customers.

Windows 7 reviews, video guides and user forum

Will it work?

Granted, the minimum system requirements that vendors list for software are generally ridiculous. Trying to run any version of Windows on a system that just meets the minimum system requirements basically means that it will boot... eventually. It will work... barely... depending on how loosely you want to define "work".

But I think it is fair for users to expect that all of the features of the operating system will work as long as the minimum system requirements are met. That is even more true if a user purchases a brand-new computer system with a logo sticker slapped on the front stating it is compatible with the given operating system.

The Windows Vista launch fiasco and the lack of compatible hardware and software were most likely contributing factors to Windows Vista logo woes. With few vendors ready with actual Windows Vista hardware vendors felt compelled to designate systems as compatible when they weren't truly capable of running all of the Windows Vista features.

Microsoft appears to have learned from Windows Vista in every way imaginable. It is almost as if Windows Vista was just a two-year beta test and experiment in failed marketing so that Microsoft could get Windows 7 right.

Regardless of how they got here, it does seem that they got Windows 7 right - Windows 7 compatible logo program and all.

See also:

Microsoft Windows 7 review

Windows 7 reviews, video guides and user forum

PC World

IDG UK Sites

EE brings 4G LTE to Cornwall and a total of 21 new towns

IDG UK Sites

iOS 8 review: Hands on with the iOS 8 beta

IDG UK Sites

5 things Android Wear *can't* do: Smartwatch OS is great but not flawless

IDG UK Sites

Sharknado 2 VFX: how The Asylum created CG flying man-eating sharks