We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
80,259 News Articles

Judge overturns jury verdict, says Apple didn't infringe patents

A court has ruled that Apple didn't infringe Mirror Worlds' patents, despite a October 2010 jury verdict that claimed that it had

Proof that jury verdicts don't always stick (although it hopefully will in the case of Apple versus Samsung); a court has ruled that Apple didn't infringe Mirror Worlds' patents, despite a October 2010 jury verdict that claimed that it had, and that it should pay $625.5m for doing so.

The jury found that Apple had infringed multiple patents that apply to displaying information on mobile devices and computer screens. The patents apply to Apple's iPhone, iPod, iPad and OS X, according to court documents, and include interface designs as Apple's "CoverFlow" - a 3D graphical interface used in iTunes and the iPhone - and its Time Machine data backup and restore software.

Apple has asked a federal judge to postpone applying the patent infringement verdict, citing a dispute over "triple dipping" made by an opposing attorney during closing arguments to the jury.

In April last year, a US Court overturned the verdict of the patent infringement case. Now a judge has ruled that Apple didn't infringe the patents and Mirror Worlds had failed to establish its case, according to Bloomberg.

Follow Karen Haslam on Twitter / Follow MacworldUK on Twitter

Related:

Apple fights multi-million dollar patent infringement verdict

Apple damages case overturned


IDG UK Sites

Best Christmas 2014 UK tech deals, Boxing Day 2014 UK tech deals & January sales 2015 UK tech...

IDG UK Sites

LED vs Halogen: Why now could be the right time to invest in LED bulbs

IDG UK Sites

Christmas' best ads: See great festive spots studios have created to promote themselves and clients

IDG UK Sites

Why Apple shouldn't be blamed for exploitation in China and Indonesia