We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
 
74,953 News Articles

AMD versus Intel - budget chips compared

Which chipmaker dominates in the value market?

Intel and AMD are the processor market's biggest players and they're constantly battling for dominance, now more than ever in the value market.

AMD's latest plan seems to be to push back on economic grounds - to offer high-value budget chipsets targeted at the soon-to-be-released Windows 7 systems, and high-performance chipsets that are slightly slower, but much cheaper, than equivalent Intel products. And Intel is firing back.

AMD's new 785G chipset, introduced last month, is designed for the mainstream and budget desktop audience. The 785G ships with drivers designed specifically to work with Windows 7, and several motherboard manufacturers, including Asus and MSI, are adopting the 785G chipset to deliver the next generation of motherboards.

AMD's goal was to compete with Intel's G41 chipset, the company's dominant chipset for the value PC market segment which launched in June 2008. But in this ever changing game of leap frog, Intel quickly came back with the introduction of the P55 chipset and the Core i5 family of CPU.

Which offers the best value for money? I decided to find out by pitting AMD's new 785G chipset against Intel's G41 and P55 chipsets. I also took a look separately at AMD's Phenom II, a high-performance processor that sacrifices a little of that performance to save some significant dollars.

AMD vs Intel

When comparing based upon value, price is the determining factor. As a result, I wanted the AMD and Intel combos to be priced about the same.

For the AMD 785G chipset, I chose an Asus motherboard (model M4A785TD-M EVO). Asus' new board is designed for AM3 series processors and has a street price of just under £85, making it very affordable.

To test Intel's G41 chipset, I chose a Gigabyte GA-G41M-ES2H motherboard for comparison, which has a street price of around £55.

To test Intel's P55 chipset, I used the Intel Desktop Board DP55KG, which was the only P55 board available at launch time. The DP55KG is currently available for £150, making it more expensive than the other boards tested here.

Lower cost boards using the chipset are set to arrive within a month or so from several manufacturers such as Asus, MSI, DFI and Gigabyte, with street prices expected to be well under £80.

I wanted to compare the three chipsets based upon a pound-for-pound basis, so I needed to pick three inexpensive CPUs to keep the pricing consistent.

On the AMD side I went with an AMD Athlon II X2 Dual Core processor (3GHz, 2MB L2 cache, 2000MHz bus, socket AM3), which has a street price of around £55.

For the Intel G41 and P55 test, I chose an Intel Core i5-750 (2.66GHz, 8MB L3 cache, socket LGA1156, 1333MHz bus) which at launch had a street price of about £145.

This meant that the P55 chipset CPU/motherboard combo would currently cost about £300, two and a half times more expensive than the AMD 785G and Intel G41 setups.

What's more, the Intel P55 chipset motherboards do not include integrated video. For a video card, I wound up choosing an Asus EAH4350 video card, which has a street price of about £25.

Laptop buying advice

See all laptop reviews

NEXT PAGE: AMD's 785G chipset

  1. We look at which budget chipset is better
  2. AMD's 785G chipset
  3. Going head-to-head
  4. Can AMD challenge Intel on the high end?
  5. Conclusions



IDG UK Sites

Amazon 3D smartphone release date, price and spec: The hologram phone?

IDG UK Sites

iPhone 5s review: why the iPhone 5s is still the best phone you can buy in 2014

IDG UK Sites

Passwords don't work: here's four ways to fix them

IDG UK Sites

The art of rebranding: Creative agency The Neighbourhood explains how & why it rebranded