We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
80,259 News Articles

Intel slams 'discriminatory' EU investigation

Chip giant unable to defend itself in AMD suit

Intel has called the European Union's (EU's) antitrust investigation into the chipmaker "discriminatory and partial", and claimed it's not being permitted to properly defend itself against the charges.

Intel is accused of abusing its monopoly power in a bid to shut rival AMD out of the CPU market, allegations laid out in a statement of objections and a supplementary statement of objections released last year and earlier this year, respectively.

According to those documents, Intel allegedly sold chips below cost and paid rebates to a computer maker and a chain of retail stores, which have not been named officially, in exchange for a commitment to only sell the company's processors and not rival products. The chip maker also allegedly paid the computer maker to delay the launch of products based on AMD chips.

See all Intel news

In previous public statements, Intel has professed its innocence and said it expects to be cleared of the charges. Now, the chip maker is taking aim at the European Commission itself and its handling of the antitrust investigation.

In the action filed on October 10, Intel claimed the EC failed to obtain "documentary evidence" from the complainant in the case, an apparent reference to AMD, and rejected Intel's assertion that it cannot respond to the antitrust charges without these documents, the journal said. Intel declared that decision was "manifestly illegal".

The chip maker did not detail what documents it wants to see, or how it expects them to bolster its claims of innocence.

Intel wants the EC decisions annulled and it wants the deadline for its reply to the statements of objections to be extended to 30 days after the documents named in its complaint are provided to the chip maker. The chip maker also wants the EC to pay its court costs.


IDG UK Sites

Best camera phone of 2015: iPhone 6 Plus vs LG G4 vs Galaxy S6 vs One M9 vs Nexus 6

IDG UK Sites

In defence of BlackBerrys

IDG UK Sites

Why we should reserve judgement on Apple ditching Helvetica in OS X/iOS for the Apple Watch's San...

IDG UK Sites

Retina 3.3GHz iMac 27in preview: Apple cuts £400 of price of Retina iMac with new model