Microsoft called the idea, which was put forward two weeks ago by plaintiffs' lawyers, an "attempt to hijack Windows Update" that would bombard millions with a message that "amounts to spam".
The Vista Capable lawsuit accuses Microsoft of duping buyers in 2006 and 2007 by letting PC makers slap a 'Vista Capable' sticker on PCs when it allegedly knew that many of those systems could run only Vista Home Basic, the entry-level version. The case, which began in 2007 and was granted class-action status in February this year, claims that Home Basic is not representative of the Vista that Microsoft marketed to consumers.
Earlier this month, the plaintiffs in the Vista Capable case asked US District Court Judge Marsha Pechman to make Microsoft use the update service to send all Windows users a notice of the class-action lawsuit. The notice, which would pop-up on users' screens, would include a link to a site where consumers could obtain more information.
Windows Update is best known for delivering security patches on the second Tuesday of each month, although it has also been used by Microsoft to push non-security updates and to patch third-party products. It has not been used for legal messages such as the one proposed by the plaintiffs' lawyers, however.
"The Court should deny Plaintiffs' attempt to hijack Microsoft's Windows Update service to distribute class notice," Microsoft's objection said. "Microsoft has told consumers and businesses that it uses Windows Update for software updates to the Windows operating system, never for general informational messages. Plaintiffs' plan, however, would use Windows Update to foist irrelevant notice on persons owning over 120 million PCs that are not the subject of this case, who should not be forced to spend time reading a notice that, as to them, amounts to spam."
Microsoft also argued that users would revolt if Windows Update was used for something other than updates. "Distribution of notice via Windows Update would likely cause some users to be upset that Microsoft acted contrary to their expectations," Microsoft said, "and they may go so far as to turn off Windows Update and lose the important protections that it provides".
NEXT PAGE: Unwanted attention
Microsoft has slammed plans that will force the company to update those involved in the Vista Capable court case through the Windows Update service
The company has already faced users angry about how Microsoft uses Windows Update. A 2006 lawsuit, for example, accused Microsoft of misleading users when it delivered an update for its Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) anti-piracy software via the service. That suit, which has sought class-action status, is ongoing. Microsoft, in fact, acknowledged the earlier lawsuit in its objection.
"Microsoft never has used Windows Update to distribute promotions, advertisements, news, or other general information to users computers," the company claimed Wednesday. "Nor has Microsoft ever been ordered to use Windows Update to distribute class notice."
It also argued that the notice would focus needless attention on the case and cost it money in support. "With more than 120 million PCs unrelated to this case receiving the notice, many users with no interest in the litigation inevitably will be uncertain what it means for a class action notice to appear suddenly on their PC," the company said. "Some surely will contact Microsoft technical support to deal with the unexpected use of Windows Update. Plaintiffs' obligation to deliver class notice should not be used to jeopardise Microsoft's customer relations or impose customer support costs."
Microsoft objected to the plaintiffs' call that it pay for the class member notification program, which would also involve advertisements in print and on the web.
The Vista Capable case is perhaps best known for the hundreds of internal Microsoft emails Pechman made public earlier this year. The messages detailed top Microsoft executives' problems with Vista shortly after it was released.
Microsoft declined to comment further about its filing today. Its lawyers, however, have requested an oral argument before Pechman about the use of Windows Update and other proposals by the plaintiffs concerning potential member notification.