We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
80,259 News Articles

Mac-based Flashback click fraud campaign was a bust

Malware infected 600,000 Macs, but hackers haven't collected a dime

The hackers in charge of the Flashback botnet managed to generate $14,000 from their click fraud campaign, but have not been paid, Symantec said today.

New analysis of the Flashback botnet and the traffic between infected Macs and command-and-control (C&C) servers exposed the earnings and the lack of payment, Liam O Murchu, manager of operations at Symantec's security response center, said in an interview today.

O Murchu credited security companies' efforts for preventing the botnet's handlers from generating more money through click fraud.

"Lots of security companies sinkholed Flashback's domains, and this caused [the hackers] a lot of problems," said O Murchu.

Starting in early April, antivirus vendors, including Symantec, snatched potential C&C domains before the attackers did, effectively blocking orders from reaching many of the estimated 600,000 infected Macs. The commands fall down a metaphoric "sinkhole" instead.

Part of the Flashback botnet survived those efforts, however. The hackers retained control of at least 10,000 Macs, which they infected with additional code that steals clicks from ads that Google's search engine displays alongside search results.

Altogether, Flashback's creators were able to use less than 2% of the botnet to crank out ghost clicks.

Even though the percentage seems small, those Macs displayed more than 10 million ads in a three-week span; 400,000 of those ads were clicked by users. The 400,000 clicks were worth approximately $14,000.

The profit-making strategy, called "click fraud," redirects large numbers of people to online ads not normally served by the site the user is viewing. The criminals receive kickbacks from the sometimes-legitimate, sometimes-shady intermediaries for each ad clicked.

In this case, said O Murchu, it seems the Flashback gang didn't actually earn a dime.

"The traffic we've analyzed tells us that they hadn't been paid," said O Murchu, referring to the hackers' efforts to get their money. "They haven't been able to provide the information to the pay-per-click [PPC] affiliate that [was] required to be paid."

O Murchu declined to identify the PPC affiliate that served 98% of the Flashback-generated clicks, but said it appeared the PPC was legitimate and not one of the shadier such firms that essentially pawn off bogus clicks as the real deal.

Legitimate PPCs employ anti-fraud controls -- including sample traffic from the source of the clicks -- because without that verification they won't be paid by advertisers, said O Murchu.

"Cashing out is the difficult part [of click fraud]," said O Murchu, noting that while other criminal gangs have gotten away with it, Flashback's backers have not.

Previously, Symantec had estimated that the Flashback botnet had the potential to earn hackers around more than $10,000 per day. "This could have been extremely profitable," said O Murchu.

O Murchu declined to estimate the current size of the Flashback botnet.

In many cases, Macs were infected by the Flashback malware via an exploit of a Java vulnerability that Apple was slow in patching on OS X 10.6, or Snow Leopard, and OS 10.7, aka Lion.

Since Flashback made headlines early in April, Apple has issued Java security updates for Snow Leopard and Lion, as well as a malware removal tool for those operating systems and OS X 10.5, better known as Leopard.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer, on Google+ or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed. His email address is [email protected].

See more by Gregg Keizer on Computerworld.com.

Read more about cybercrime and hacking in Computerworld's Cybercrime and Hacking Topic Center.

IDG UK Sites

Best camera phone of 2015: iPhone 6 Plus vs LG G4 vs Galaxy S6 vs One M9 vs Nexus 6

IDG UK Sites

In defence of BlackBerrys

IDG UK Sites

Why we should reserve judgement on Apple ditching Helvetica in OS X/iOS for the Apple Watch's San...

IDG UK Sites

Retina 3.3GHz iMac 27in preview: Apple cuts £400 of price of Retina iMac with new model