We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
 
75,052 News Articles

Dutch court rules iPhone 4S does not infringe Samsung 3G patents

A court in The Hague has ruled that Apple is covered by a patent license Samsung granted to chip supplier Qualcomm

Apple's iPhone 4S does not infringe on four of Samsung Electronics' key 3G patents, a court in The Hague, Netherlands, has ruled.

Apple need not pay Samsung royalties on the patents because the patents are already covered by Samsung's licensing deal with Qualcomm, the maker of the 3G baseband chips used in the latest iPhone. This means Samsung's patent rights in the case are exhausted, the court judges ruled.

In April 2011, Samsung told Apple and Qualcomm that Apple was not covered by the license Samsung had granted Qualcomm for the patented technology. However, the Dutch court has now ruled that was not true. Qualcomm's license for Samsung's standards-essential patents contains a stipulation that it also applies to "any customer" of Qualcomm.

That license was granted in 2009 and predates the iPhone 4S. The patents in question are therefore not enforceable with regards to Apple; they are "exhausted". It is, however, unclear whether this is also true for earlier iPhones and iPads, which use baseband chips from Intel or Infineon. The Dutch court will give Apple the chance to prove this in a future session with documents from the U.S.

A ban on product sales, which Samsung has requested, is out of the question. "Samsung has no right to ban, recall or order the destruction of Apple products. This would put under undue pressure on the parties in ongoing negotiations for a license," wrote the panel of judges.

Under the patent rules associated with the UMTS 3G standard, Samsung is obliged to grant a license to Apple under "fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory" (FRAND) conditions. The court said it did not believe that Apple had behaved unreasonably in its negotiations with Samsung, and concluded there was no reason for a ban on sales.

Last October, the Hague judge reached a similar conclusion, although at that time it was not yet clear that Samsung's patents were exhausted in respect of the iPhone 4S. Meanwhile, the European Commission is conducting an investigation into possible abuse of patent rights by Samsung.


IDG UK Sites

Netflix to introduce price increase: New subcribers to start with

IDG UK Sites

Apple financial results: iPhones, iPads & Macs sales for Apple's Q2 2014, plus shares to split

IDG UK Sites

Twitter - not news

IDG UK Sites

See Moo Studios' new animated advert for Blue Moon beer