We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
78,785 News Articles

YouTube & Google hit with $1bn lawsuit

Viacom slams 'brazen disregard' of copyright

Viacom International is suing YouTube and its parent company Google for more than $1bn, saying the companies are infringing on Viacom's copyrights because almost 160,000 unauthorised video clips are available for viewing on YouTube.

Viacom also said it is seeking an injunction prohibiting Google and YouTube from further copyright infringement. Google acquired YouTube in November for $1.65bn.

The 27-page lawsuit alleges that thousands of unauthorised clips of Viacom's programming have been viewed on YouTube more than 1.5 billion times.

Google said it hasn't yet received the lawsuit but is "confident that YouTube has respected the legal rights of copyright holders and believe the courts will agree”.

"YouTube is great for users and offers real opportunities to rights holders: the opportunity to interact with users; to promote their content to a young and growing audience; and to tap into the online advertising market. We will certainly not let this suit become a distraction to the continuing growth and strong performance of YouTube and its ability to attract more users, more traffic and build a stronger community," said a Google statement.

Viacom said: "YouTube is a significant, for-profit organisation that has built a lucrative business out of exploiting the devotion of fans to others' creative works in order to enrich itself and its corporate parent, Google.

“Their business model, which is based on building traffic and selling advertising off of unlicensed content, is clearly illegal and is in obvious conflict with copyright laws. In fact, YouTube's strategy has been to avoid taking proactive steps to curtail the infringement on its site, thus generating significant traffic and revenues for itself while shifting the entire burden - and high cost - of monitoring YouTube onto the victims of its infringement," Viacom stated.

Viacom said it filed the suit "after a great deal of unproductive negotiation" and that "YouTube continues in its unlawful business model”. Last month, the company demanded that YouTube remove more than more than 100,000 of Viacom's video clips from its site.

"There is no question that YouTube and Google are continuing to take the fruit of our efforts without permission and destroying enormous value in the process," Viacom said. "Therefore, we must turn to the courts to prevent Google and YouTube from continuing to steal value from artists and to obtain compensation for the significant damage they have caused."

A Viacom spokesman said the company has no comment beyond the press release and lawsuit.

In the lawsuit, Viacom alleges that "YouTube's brazen disregard of the intellectual property laws fundamentally threatens not just [Viacom], but the economic underpinnings of one of the most important sectors of the United States economy”.

The lawsuit also alleges that YouTube "purports to be a forum for users to share their own original 'user-generated' video content. In reality, however, a vast amount of that content consists of infringing copies of [Viacom's] copyrighted works, including such popular (and obviously copyrighted) television programming and motion pictures as SpongeBob SquarePants, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, The Colbert Report, South Park, Ren & Stimpy, MTV Unplugged, An Inconvenient Truth, Mean Girls and many others."
Through its operations, YouTube "knowingly reproduces and publicly performs the copyrighted works uploaded to its site", the lawsuit alleges. "Defendants know and intend that a substantial amount of the content on the YouTube site consists of unlicensed infringing copies of copyrighted works and have done little or nothing to prevent this massive infringement."

While YouTube has a process where copyright holders can identify postings of material that infringes on copyrights so that it can be removed, YouTube makes the process onerous on the copyright holders, the lawsuit alleges.

According to the lawsuit, YouTube "has decided to shift the burden entirely onto copyright owners to monitor the YouTube site on a daily or hourly basis to detect infringing videos and send notices to YouTube demanding that it 'take down' the infringing works”.

The problem with that process, the lawsuit continues, is that even after being removed, the infringing video is often uploaded again by another YouTube user and it appears again on the site within hours.

"Defendants have actual knowledge and clear notice of this massive infringement, which is obvious to even the most casual visitor to the site," the lawsuit states. "Indeed, the presence of infringing copyrighted material on YouTube is fully intended by defendants as a critical part of their business plan to drive traffic and increase YouTube's network, market share and enterprise value, as reflected in the recent purchase price of $1.65 billion."

Instead of allowing copyrighted materials to be posted and viewed on its website, YouTube "has the right and ability to control the massive infringement on its site" through its Terms of Use, which users must agree to when using the site, the suit alleges. "Through its Terms of Use, YouTube imposes a wide number of content-based restrictions on the types of videos uploaded to the site, and reserves and exercises the unfettered right to block or remove any video which, in its sole discretion, it deems 'inappropriate.' YouTube proactively reviews and removes pornographic videos from its library, but refuses to do the same thing for videos that obviously infringe plaintiffs' copyrights."

"YouTube has failed to employ reasonable measures that could substantially reduce, or eliminate, the massive amount of copyright infringement on the YouTube site from which YouTube directly profits," the lawsuit alleges. "Even though defendants are well aware of the rampant infringement on the YouTube website, and YouTube has the right and ability to control it, YouTube's intentional strategy has been to take no steps to curtail the infringement from which it profits unless notified of specific infringing videos by copyright owners, thereby shifting the entire burden - and high cost - of monitoring YouTube's infringement onto the victims of that infringement."

Viacom's entertainment brands include MTV, VH1, Country Music Television, Logo, Nickelodeon, Nick at Nite, Comedy Central, Spike TV, TV Land, and more than 130 networks around the world, as well as MTV.com, comedycentral.com, VSPOT, TurboNick, Neopets, Xfire and iFilm, BET Networks, Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks and Famous Music.

More here and here.

www.computerworld.com


IDG UK Sites

Chromecast deals aplenty as gadget turns one: Discounts and free music streaming

IDG UK Sites

Apple updates MacBook Pro line-up: Price cuts & spec boosts for 6 MacBook Pro models

IDG UK Sites

Introducing generation tech

IDG UK Sites

5 ways drones are being used for good