We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
 
75,052 News Articles

Google click-fraud settlement approved

Judge gives search giant slap on wrist

A judge has given final approval to the settlement of a click-fraud lawsuit, despite critics' characterisation of the settlement as a slap on the wrist for Google.

Judge Joe Griffin, of Miller County Circuit Court in Arkansas, heard arguments for and against approving the settlement on Monday and Tuesday, and signed off on the final settlement on Wednesday, according to a copy of the court order.

"We're pleased Judge Griffin has affirmed the settlement as appropriate and fair to advertisers. We look forward to continuing to manage invalid clicks effectively and provide our advertisers with an outstanding return on their investment," said Nicole Wong, associate general counsel at Google, in a statement.

The decision isn't surprising, considering Judge Griffin had given preliminary approval earlier this year to the settlement of the nationwide class-action lawsuit filed by lead plaintiff Lane's Gifts and Collectibles against Google and other internet companies.

In the lawsuit, Lane's Gifts alleged being overcharged for online ads as a result of click fraud, which occurs when someone clicks on a pay-per-click ad with a malicious intent.

For example, a company official may click on competitors' ads to increase their ad spending, or a publisher may click on his website's ads to increase his commissions. Estimates about click-fraud incidence vary, with some putting it as high as 20 percent of all clicks.

The February 2005 lawsuit includes other internet companies such as Yahoo and AOL, which haven't settled. Lane's Gifts and the class, excluding a number of plaintiffs who objected to the agreement, settled with Google for $90m (about £48m). A third of that amount will go to pay lawyers' fees and the rest as credits to affected advertisers who can certify click-fraud instances.

The class, which Judge Griffin also certified in his final order, includes buyers of Google online ads between 1 January 2002 and Wednesday. In the settlement, Google denied the plaintiffs' claims and didn't admit to any wrongdoing or legal liability.

In this week's hearing, the judge heard objections from plaintiffs who complained that the settlement amount was too small, that too much money will go to lawyers and that the agreement puts too much of a burden on affected advertisers to prove click fraud.

Joseph Kinney is suing Google and Lane's Gifts in this same Arkansas court to have the now-final settlement dismantled. In his lawsuit, Kinney asked the court to declare Lane's Gifts as not adequately representing the nationwide class of plaintiffs. He also asked for a temporary and permanent injunction blocking the settlement.

As part of the settlement, a New York University computer science expert conducted an independent examination of Google's click-fraud detection methods. The expert, Alexander Tuzhilin, concluded that Google is making a "reasonable" effort to fight click fraud.


IDG UK Sites

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 release date, price and specs 2014

IDG UK Sites

What's the best smartwatch? 11 iWatch rivals compared in our wearables round-up

IDG UK Sites

5 reasons to upgrade to BT's YouView+ box: DTR-T1000 vs DTR-T2100

IDG UK Sites

Developers get access to more Sony camera features