We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
79,814 News Articles

US scolds tech companies for China censorship

Putting profits above free expression

Members of the US House of Representatives yesterday ripped into four US technology companies, calling them a "disgrace" for allowing the Chinese government to censor some web content.

Representative Tom Lantos and other members of the House International Relations Committee criticised Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and Cisco for making profits a higher priority than free expression in China.

"Instead of using their power and creativity to bring openness and free speech to China, they have caved into Beijing's outrageous but predictable demands, simply for the sake of profits," said Lantos, a Californian Democrat. "These captains of industry should have been developing new technologies to bypass the sickening censorship of government and repugnant barriers to the internet. Instead, they enthusiastically volunteered for the Chinese censorship brigade."

Representatives of the four companies said they object to the Chinese government's censorship efforts, but they believe their presence in the communist nation will help broaden the political debate there. Lawmakers criticised Yahoo because subsidiary Yahoo Holdings (Hong Kong) provided email account information to the Chinese government that led to jail sentences for a Chinese political activist and a journalist.

They also lectured Google for offering a censored version of its search engine in China and Microsoft for removing from MSN Spaces a blog written by a Chinese journalist. Committee members also questioned whether Cisco is helping the Chinese government block access to some websites by selling it network management equipment.

"We believe information is power," said Michael Callahan, Yahoo's senior vice-president and general counsel. "We also believe the internet is a positive force in China. It has revolutionised information access, helps create open societies and helps accelerate the gradual evolution toward a more outward-looking Chinese society."

Callahan called the case of dissident Shi Tao "distressing" to Yahoo. He was sentenced last April to 10 years in prison. The company did not know who the Chinese government was targeting or what crime was supposedly committed when Yahoo received a demand for information from Chinese law enforcement, he said.

"Let me state our view clearly and without equivocation: we condemn punishment of any activity internationally recognised as free expression, whether that punishment takes place in China or anywhere else in the world," Callahan said.

Representative Christopher Smith, a New Jersey Republican, said he plans to introduce legislation spelling out what actions US companies are required to take when doing business in "repressive" countries. More than 80 dissidents and journalists have been arrested in China for posting information critical of the government on the internet, he said.

"These are not victimless crimes," said Smith, chairman of the House committee's Africa, Global Human Rights and International Operations subcommittee. "We need to stand with the oppressed, not the oppressors."

Smith criticised Cisco, saying the company owns an estimated 60 percent of the Chinese market for networking gear. "Yet Cisco has also done little creative thinking to try to minimise the likelihood that its products will be used repressively, such as limiting eavesdropping abilities to specific computer addresses," he said.

Cisco can't control how governments use its network security equipment to block websites, said Mark Chandler, Cisco's senior vice-president and general counsel. If China develops its own networking equipment, that "will exacerbate rather than solve the problems", he said.

While many committee members criticised the companies, some Democrats questioned how Republicans have pushed for the US to open trading markets with China, then criticise companies for complying with Chinese law. Some Democrats also suggested the US needed to examine its own human rights record, including revelations last year that President Bush has authorised the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on internet and telephone communications without court-issued warrants.

"I hope that as we preach to China, we practise what we preach," said Representative Diane Watson, a Californian Democrat.


IDG UK Sites

The 30 best TV shows on Netflix UK: Our pick of the best programmes you can watch right now

IDG UK Sites

Nostalgia time: Top 10 best selling mobile phones in history

IDG UK Sites

VFX Emmy: Game of Thrones work garners gong for Rodeo FX

IDG UK Sites

Apple 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina review (2.6GHz, 128GB, mid-2014)