We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
80,259 News Articles

Career Watch: When the CIO isn't part of the team

Ask a Premier 100 IT Leader: David O'Berry

The self-described "reformed CxO/CIO" answers questions about the need for the CIO to be part of the team and more.

Our CIO is always stressing how important it is that we, his direct reports, work together as a team, but he doesn't act like he's part of the team himself. There are a lot of us, but he doesn't even know all our names, and he seems more interested in hobnobbing with other C-level officers. I see the value of those relationships, but am I wrong to expect him to display a bit more solidarity with his direct reports? I can see right out the gate that your question is not going to have me making friends with the C suite. The unfortunate truth is that leaders are often born, not made. I would tend to believe your current CIO falls into the "tried to make a leader and did not succeed" category.

Just Ask

Got a Question?

If you have a question for one of our Premier 100 IT Leaders, send it to [email protected], and watch for this column each month.

The team comes first, period. If you truly care as a leader, then it shows, and it directly shows in the accomplishments of your team. Otherwise, you are just looked at as someone using others to get to the next rung in the ladder. "Do as I say, not as I do" is a hypocritical recipe for disaster, especially when "teamwork" concepts are thrown around. Trust matters, and he needs to earn it, or he will never be anything but a placeholder for the next person. I always say, "I will be led; I will not be herded." If I feel that way, why would I ever expect anyone who worked for me to feel differently? Your CIO needs to wake up or change careers to something that he can do by himself instead of with a team.

I was laid off from my job as a project manager about five months ago. I've had a few interviews, but I haven't been enthusiastic about the jobs. They seem to offer only more of what I've already done. My wife says this is no time to be fussy, and I understand her point, but I want to give this more time and try to find something with broader horizons. Would I be better off accepting a job now and closing off this gap on my résumé, or should I hold out a bit longer? Tough call. It will depend on the length of time the gap is and what you are doing to fill it. For instance, if you have legitimate work, even for a nonprofit or as an independent consultant, then you can maybe wait a bit longer. At the same time, perfection is the enemy of progress, and though your age and financial state are factors, it is probably better to close the gap. At the same time, use your known skills and abilities to add more to whatever organization you join. If you don't go in assuming it's a dead end, a path may open up to something you never considered.


IDG UK Sites

Best Black Friday 2014 tech deals: Get bargains on smartphones, tablets, laptops and more

IDG UK Sites

What the Internet of Things will look like in 2015: homes will get smarter, people might get fitter

IDG UK Sites

See how Trunk's animated ad helped Ade Edmondson plug The Car Buying Service

IDG UK Sites

Yosemite tips: Complete Guide to OS X Yosemite