We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
78,696 News Articles

Cheaper printer cartridges win approval

Court overrides Lexmark's refill prevention

In what marks a major victory for printer cartridge manufacturers worldwide, the United States Copyright Office yesterday held that third-party manufacturers were free to sell chips to override technology on Lexmark printers which prevent consumers refilling used cartridges.

Lexmark brought an action against cartridge maker Static Control Components (SCC) back in December for manufacturing and selling so-called Smartek chips for use in Lexmark's products.

SCC's chips contain software that overrides authentication procedures installed by Lexmark to prevent unauthorised cartridges being used in its machines, thereby allowing owners to install cheaper third party cartridges.

The Copyright Office held that, under the terms of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), aftermarket companies should be allowed to develop software to promote interoperability between remanufactured toner cartridges and printers.

"We are very gratified that the Copyright Office has agreed with our position," said Ed Swartz CEO of Static Control Components US. "It has provided a means to force Lexmark to discontinue these practices that are against the public interest and cost consumers a great deal of money."

The decision could lead to a whole host of cartridge manufacturing companies now challenging Lexmark's copyright on its smart chips.

This is SCC's second victory against Lexmark. Back in August it successfully challenged the validity of the printer company's US return program mdash; where consumers agreed to buy only Lexmark cartridges in return for a discount of around $50 on each new cartridge — with the court ruling the system void and unenforcable in the state of North Carolina.

It's been a bad few weeks for the printer industry, with consumers in the US also taking action against Epson, accusing it of manipulating equipment in order to sell more ink.

Related links:

IDG UK Sites

Motorola Moto G vs Nokia Lumia 530 comparison: What's the best budget smartphone

IDG UK Sites

Everything you need to know about Apple's iPhone Camera in iOS 8

IDG UK Sites

Why you shouldn't trust password managers

IDG UK Sites

How to make an 'Apple iWatch' using an iPod nano and a 3D printer