We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
78,713 News Articles

Consumers question copyright laws

Music lovers genuinely angry

A recent survey claims 55 percent of UK consumers have ripped CDs they legally own to their iPod or computer.

The NCC (National Consumer Council) commissioned market research from YouGov, which spoke with 2,135 UK adults between 10-12 April.

The survey found that despite the litigation-happy music industry's insistence that ripping music from legally owned CDs contravenes copyright law, consumer habits show that to be an outdated notion.

A significant 59 percent of the survey group believe ripping in this way to be totally legal, with just 19 percent aware that it isn't.

The survey results come as the NCC prepares to make its submission to the UK government's Gowers Review, which is looking at copyright law.

It will say that this aspect of existing law is out of step with modern consumer culture and puts unrealistic limits on private viewing habits.

NCC activist Jill Johnstone said: "We need to shake up the copyright law to incorporate consumers' fair-use rights – including the right to copy for private use."

The NCC is also challenging music industry demands that the copyright life be extended, arguing that this makes no economic sense, and that the music labels should focus on new releases, not back catalogue, for their business plans.

"Whether for films, literary or musical works, sound recordings or broadcasts, the length of all copyright terms should be reduced to fit more closely the time period over which most financial returns are normally made," Johnstone said.

She criticised major label greed. "The current campaign by the music industry to extend copyright terms for sound recordings beyond fifty years has no justification," she said.

"Evidence shows that music companies generally make returns on material in a matter of years, not decades. Current terms already provide excessive protection of intellectual property rights at a cost to consumers."

This story first appeared on Macworld.co.uk.


IDG UK Sites

Motorola Moto G vs Nokia Lumia 530 comparison: What's the best budget smartphone

IDG UK Sites

Everything you need to know about Apple's iPhone Camera in iOS 8

IDG UK Sites

Why you shouldn't trust password managers

IDG UK Sites

How to make an 'Apple iWatch' using an iPod nano and a 3D printer