|
|
|
Start new subject | Reply to this subject
|
[1]
|
TopCat® |
Tue, 18/09/07@18:12
|
|
If this is true - click here - then many satisfied Vista users are going to be a bit miffed, unless they forego this service pack, that is. I wondered if the Forum Editor had any news on this surprising turn-around. TC.
|
sidecar sid |
Tue, 18/09/07@18:17
|
|
Pfft April the first allready?
|
gudgulf |
Tue, 18/09/07@18:18
|
|
If this is true?????????
Read this link (from the page you posted) click here
Total spoof but still funny!
|
Arthur Scrimshaw |
Tue, 18/09/07@18:28
|
|
I think gudgulf's link is far more credible.
|
TopCat® |
Tue, 18/09/07@18:37
|
|
Suckered!! Well, it seems I've been spoofed alright but I'm not the only one - click here I was expecting some world-wide furore if it had been true, :o) TC.
|
Totally-braindead |
Tue, 18/09/07@19:09
|
|
You really didn't think this was true did you?
Look at the last paragraph "Elston also added that if people complain too much they'll just revert to Windows ME. "
The next stage I suppose if they keep complaining would be either Win98 or going the whole hog and put them back to 3.11.
|
Forum Editor |
Tue, 18/09/07@19:13
|
|
A massive clue to the nature of this story is in this:
"We can move people off of Vista development now, and move them to Windows 7 development," said Elston. "That should allow us to only delay Windows 7 by thirteen months past its scheduled date instead of the planned eighteen."
Nobody at that kind of senior level in Microsoft would say "off of" - at least I hope not.
|
Percy Vere |
Tue, 18/09/07@20:22
|
|
' "We're focused on giving the customer what they want, and want they want is to just go back to XP," said Microsoft Development Chief Greg Elston. '
Lot of wanting in there. I am sure those who write the speeches for Microsoft have either good grammar or use software to proof it.
|
TopCat® |
Tue, 25/09/07@11:37
|
|
Funny, isn't it, that in a roundabout way the story above actually has some part truth in it. I feel somewhat vindicated now. :o) TC. click here
|
sunny staines |
Sat, 29/09/07@12:15
|
|
with all the back peddling by ms re vista and xp over the last week time is right for a good price reduction to get sales of vista going.
|
jz |
Sun, 30/09/07@21:55
|
|
I'd always assumed that "off of" was correct American English.
|
Teaboy |
Mon, 01/10/07@17:44
|
|
jz- There is no such beast as American English! There is American, and there is English. Happily the Atlantic is between.
|
g0slp |
Mon, 01/10/07@17:59
|
|
Britain & USA.
Two nations divided by a common language...
I'll get me coat :)
|
al7478 |
Mon, 01/10/07@18:00
|
|
"A massive clue to the nature of this story
is in this:
"We can move people off of Vista development now, and move them to Windows 7 development," said Elston. "That should allow us to only delay Windows 7 by thirteen months past its scheduled date instead of the planned eighteen."
Nobody at that kind of senior level in Microsoft would say "off of" - at least I hope not."
LOL! the best give away is in those two words...?! Oh, how i laughed!
|
jz |
Tue, 09/10/07@19:44
|
|
The differences in UK English and American English are pretty minor really. I always think of American English as a slightly improved version of UK English. Color is more sensible than colour, and program is more sensible than programme.
|
Snec |
Tue, 09/10/07@23:54
|
|
jz Sorry to say this but neither is more sensible, they are different words.
Program (computer) & programme (television) have two entirely different definitions.
|
|
[1]
|
|
Total threads 330674 | Total posts 2151792 | Total users 295504
|
|
Forums > Speakers' corner
|
Back to top
|