Tech Consumer Advice
It's free to register, to post a question or to start / join a discussion
New MOT test for 2012
Likes # 0
Posted January 15, 2012 at 11:01AM
Only just seen this http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/news/legal--motoring-advice/2011-12/new-mot-rules/ and just wondered how many motorists are going to have their car fail because of say a dash board light not working or even a trailer/caravan electrical socket that doesn't work.
A woman I know has been driving for the past few months with the Electronic Stability Control light on even thought it is working so her car will fail.
Likes # 0
Posted January 15, 2012 at 2:18PM
Looking at the changes I agree 100% with them.
Likes # 0
Posted January 16, 2012 at 11:21AM
*Seats It must be possible to secure the driver's seat fore and aft adjustment mechanism in two or three different positions. On electric seats the motors must move the seat fore and aft.*
So that's my Father-In-Law's Morgan failed, the driver's seat is fixed and the peddle box moves fore & aft
Likes # 0
Posted January 16, 2012 at 2:36PM
I can see nothing to complain about. All sensible, safety related, requirements.
Likes # 0
Posted January 16, 2012 at 3:41PM
I agree. The only people who should worry are those who have been ignoring lights etc. And I know several who have been doing so!
Likes # 0
Posted January 16, 2012 at 6:39PM
But lights have been tested for donkey's years! Doesn't stop the bulb failing the next day.
Likes # 0
Posted January 16, 2012 at 8:23PM
One interesting new requirement that will lead to thousands of failures is working washers for cars with High Intensity Discharge lights (those Xenon lights that dazzle you).
I've got them on my car (manufacturer fitted) and wondered why the car also had funky pop-out headlamp washers that squirt the lights every other time I wash the windows, well it seems that washers are a requirement as dirt on the lamps can lead to dangerous light diffusion.
There's loads of people with after market xenon lamps, because it's reasonably simple to fit the new lights, but I doubt that many people also go to the expense and time consuming work required to fit washers to the new lights...
Likes # 0
Posted January 17, 2012 at 4:20PM
While the government are it, perhaps they should consider a revision on road repairs and speed safety devices, that council's seem to introduce on a regular basis.
My vehicle was due for an MOT the other day, and it failed on a 'dodgy' rear spring and exhaust end box. My friend who owns and runs a garage with MOT facilities, showed me a skip with quite a number of 'under-body' parts that had been damaged via road humps and potholes etc. He said that his testers were failing more vehicles for this very reason, and perhaps the worse part, is that this damage is not being picked up until the MOT is required?.
Likes # 0
Posted January 19, 2012 at 9:08PM
There are a number of inaccuracies in that article,in the 4th paragraph he states This means that if you have any of the following problems with your car you've got until the first MOT renewal date after 1 April 2012 to get it fixed. The following failures apply now;-
Ball joint dust covers are now a fail if they allow the ingress of dirt
power steering fluid level below minimum
products on a light lens eg tinting reducing the light output
Insecure battery
Drivers seat adjustment
door opening controls, hinges and catches
missing cat converter
The other items will be applicable from April fools day.
you can view the mot testing manual here
Likes # 0
Posted January 19, 2012 at 9:19PM
spuds
I'm seeing many items such as you describe, most are not being picked up until mot time as service schedules are being ignored (owing to lack of funds) nowadays.
Extended service intervals also can cause problems too.
a visit to an mot tester's blog shows many examples.
The current thoughts of the government moving to a 4-2-2 testing period will see many more examples of the above
Likes # 0
Posted January 23, 2012 at 12:04AM
Perhaps an add-on to the subject of future MOT's!.
Not sure if a guideline as been circulated to MOT stations, but it would appear that some MOT examiner's are now advising about replacing tyres after five years, due to tyre 'degrading' whether used or not.
In 2000 it was a requirement that all tyre manufacturer's date stamped tyres with the year of manufacture. Somewhere on the tyre (after 2000) you should find a mark (as examples) like 2107, 1504 or whatever. The last two digits in the examples would mean 07= 2007 or 04= 2004. The first two digits would mean the week of the year manufactured, so 2107 would mean 21st week of 2007, and 1504 would mean 15th week of 2004.
So if your vehicle as tyres showing a date stamp of 0107 or before, then the MOT examiner might suggest replacements, even though the tyres look very sound and roadworthy?.
Reply to this topic
This thread has been locked.
Check out PC Advisor's other tech forums
Top 5 Most Popular
-
New Xbox One release date, specs, features and price in UK
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Apple iPhone 5 comparison review
-
Galaxy S4 vs BlackBerry Z10 comparison review - which is best, the Samsung or the BlackBerry?
-
Best cases and covers for the new iPad: protect your tablet in style
-
Microsoft Windows 8 review



