We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
Contact Forum Editor

Send an email to our Forum Editor:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the Forum Editor know who sent the message. Both your name and email address will not be used for any other purpose.

Speakers Corner


It's free to register, to post a question or to start / join a discussion


 

How good is your maths


bumpkin
Resolved

Likes # 0

I was asked if I had a HDMI cable which I do but they are not all the same obviously. I use HMDI as an example,the same applies to any connector.Here comes the maths bit. If there are connectors, one big and one small, one male and one female how many cables would be needed to satisfy any situation without inter connection or adapters. Long time since I studied maths but I make it 27,how about you? Now introduce a medium size and then what is the answer. Just a fun question. There is no doubt a formula for this sort of thing if anyone can remind me.

Like this post
chub_tor

Likes # 0

BRYNIT You missed out Large Male to Large Female L/M - L/F in your notation which takes it up to 10.

Like this post
bumpkin

Likes # 0

I got 9 the first time then cubed it hence the stupid 27.

Like this post
bumpkin

Likes # 0

Answers so far 27, 16, 10, 9, 6.

Like this post
marvin42

Likes # 0

At 12.42am bumpkin clarified his question as "My point is how many ways are there for pairing 2 from 4 options."

So you only have 4 options and you have to use 2 of them at a time.

Like this post
bumpkin

Likes # 0

Perhaps my "clarification" was not so clarifying after all, I may have worded it badly but the original post should make it clear what I meant, if not then my fault for not explaining properly.

Like this post
spider9

Likes # 0

bumpkin

So, are you accepting the answers, 10 for the original and 21 for the introduction of the mediums?

Like this post
bumpkin

Likes # 0

Yes, seems right to me.

Like this post
marvin42

Likes # 0

If we are talking mathematically and you allow like to like connections, then you must have 2 of each kind (otherwis you can't connect like to like 'cos you don't have them). This makes 8 options not 4 and 2 from 8 is 28 (Pascal's triangle).

However, if we are talking practically, the OP said "without adaptors" and I don't think it's possible to connect male to male or female to female without an adaptor so like to like connection is not possible.

Like this post
marvin42

Likes # 0

Incidentally - add medium and it makes 12 choices - 2 from 12 is 66.

Like this post
chub_tor

Likes # 0

marvin42 I read the original post about "without adaptors" as a reference to the length (which bumpkin has admitted is a bit of a red herring).

Think of it this way; two pieces of kit need to be connected together. Each piece of kit might have either a Small or a Large connector either of which might be either Male or Female. To cover these combinations you would need 10 different pieces of cable with the selection of Large, Small, Male and Female.

I have no knowledge of Pascal's Triangle but if you do it empirically and write the combinations down on a piece of paper and remember (which is what I forgot at the beginning) that a cable for example with a Large Female at one end and a Small female a the other is exactly the same as a Small Female with a Large Female. Then you get 10 combinations that will join together any two pieces of kit that you have.

But Wiz-king is right, according to Murphy's Law you still won't have the one that you want in your tool box.

Like this post

Reply to this topic

This thread has been locked.



IDG UK Sites

Best Christmas 2014 UK tech deals, Boxing Day 2014 UK tech deals & January sales 2015 UK tech...

IDG UK Sites

LED vs Halogen: Why now could be the right time to invest in LED bulbs

IDG UK Sites

Christmas' best ads: See great festive spots studios have created to promote themselves and clients

IDG UK Sites

Why Apple shouldn't be blamed for exploitation in China and Indonesia