FE Telegraph report

flycatcher1

"Words fail me", but does it really, because I assume by your comments that having a D-Notice served on yourself, you have perhaps clearly stated how you are well aware how the system can and does work on occasions, and the public are not aware of this, or ever will be?.

There are on many occasions, and history as shown this,when discussions are taken behind closed doors, and the results of those meetings can effect a person's life for the foreseeable future. Yet some will still insist that they know all the facts, usually based on reading a media report, and then claim or insist justice as been served - the verdict was right!.

spuds

"He as tried to explain this fact, as others have also tried to explain this, as they see that fit or that fact. The fact is, that some quarter's are not accepting this."

This is going around and around.

You can't 'explain' why an illegal firearm is found in your possession - it's either there or it isn't, and if it is you have committed an offence. As I've said - repeatedly - this man pleaded guilty, and you don't plead guilty to a crime if you are innocent, no matter what advice you might be given to the contrary.

What you're doing is attempting to infer that in some way this man is innocent of the crime because there were extenuating circumstances. If there were, they might have been considered as mitigating when the judge considered his sentence, and that is certainly why the appeal judges reduced it. It still doesn't alter the fact of the man's guilt however, no matter what you might say about "a number of agendas"

What are these agendas,and who is running them, and what are these revelations you mention?

You say "I have mentioned in earlier posts, knowing the fully facts and how the systems might work, can bring a whole different light on the subject," but you don't know the full facts yourself, so what 'whole different light' are you talking about?

FE

You have clearly stated

" You don't plead guilty to a crime if you are innocent, no matter what advice you might be given to the contrary"

My answer to that is very simple, that comment is utter nonsense, because it truly shows how much lack of knowledge you have of the system. Try talking to anyone in the legal profession, media or visit a courtroom, and see and hear how some of the verdicts are reached, it might be an eye opener.

I am not being judge or jury on this particular person. Regarding agendas, I would think that flycatcher1 recent observations might suggest this. You seemed to be interested in getting the news to that new report. Nobody tries to silence someone, in whatever form or manner, unless there is a purpose?.

I am not an expert or fortune teller, but I bet there is more to this story than what as been released so far, and I think I mentioned that in an earlier posting. Watch this space so they say!.