We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
Contact Forum Editor

Send an email to our Forum Editor:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the Forum Editor know who sent the message. Both your name and email address will not be used for any other purpose.

Speakers Corner


It's free to register, to post a question or to start / join a discussion


 

Israel and the Gaza strip


john bunyan

Likes # 0

This seems an intractable problem. The Israelis will not allow ships etc to go to Gaza as they fear smuggling of arms and rockets. Hamas responds by smuggling through tunnels from Egypt.The whole Palestinian embryo State has been seeking statehood for years but even they cannot show a united front. The Israelis continue to build in disputed land. Iran stirs it up in the background. The Israeli response to rocket attacks is disproportionate. The whole thing could get out of hand. Talks seem a waste of time as each side loathes the other. How depressing; there seems little hope for peace in our time.

Like this post
Aitchbee

Likes # 0

I've declared war on the gnats that appear on my windows [inside windows] ... I just squash them against the window-pane but next morning, dozens of 'em reappear for the same punishment; if I were to put my plant pots outside the gnats would be free to do as they please.

Israel treats it's neighbours in a similar way ... this is just my opinion.

Like this post
Forum Editor

Likes # 0

Southern Israelis who live near the border with Gaza are in a constant state of tension. They fear (and with good reason) the rocket attacks that are a feature of the state of more or less permanent conflict.

Israel's justification for its retaliation is that its citizens are entitled to live without this constant threat.Israel regards Hamas as a terrorist organisation.

Both sides want something - Hamas desperately needs the Gaza/Israel cargo crossings open. Israel wants the Palestinian attacks to cease, a truce that is internationally supervised, and the re-arming of Hamas to stop.

All of that is incidental to what is at the real heart of the matter, and that's land. It has been a central issue for decades, and the way things look at the moment there is virtually no hope of any kind of lasting settlement. People on both sides are killed, and that breeds a burning desire for revenge in the young of both Palestinians and Israelis alike. It's a self-perpetuating situation.

Like this post
Jock1e

Likes # 0

My thoughts were start with Palestine then move quickly into Iran.

They have the excuse now that Iran has been supplying Palastine with long range missiles which they are using to target Israel city's.

Probably wrong of course but no doubt the fuel prices will shoot up shortly.

Like this post
michaelw

Likes # 0

If the situation escalates and other parts of Arabia are drawn into the conflict and it turns into a much nastier situation there's a possibility countries like Russia (another nutter in power) can intervene and where do we go from there?

Mushroom clouds are so pretty, and I love the smell of nuclear fallout in the morning.

Like this post
Fruit Bat /\0/\

Likes # 0

Yes its about land.

The Arabs feel that the Israelis took their land

The Jews believe its theirs as promised in the Bible (sorry about breaking the no religion rule).

However history tells us that land belongs to those who are strong enough to take it and strong enough to hold onto it.

Land has been changing hands since the beginning of human history the political map of the world (boundaries) nowadays, looks nothing like what I remember from my school days.

Africa and Europe have changed a lot in the last 30 yrs.

Empires come and Empires go - USSR?

michaelw

Putin - his bosses won't let him start a nuclear war too bad for business.

Unfortunately I wouldn't say the same for Iran or North Korea

Like this post
spider9

Likes # 0

We must all hope the MAD principle will still deter. It seems unlikely that any 'small' player would instigate a nuclear exchange when their own lands would be the first to be razed to the ground by the 'big boys'.

A terrorist nuclear device in a suitcase is a much bigger threat, however.

Trouble now is there are not just the two old combatants (US/USSR) - so keeping a lid on things becomes that much harder than in the old days.

Like this post
Woolwell

Likes # 0

spider9 - "A terrorist nuclear device in a suitcase is a much bigger threat, however." There is some doubt that such devices exist and if they do then probably only USA, Russia or China would be able to create one. A nuclear bomb is a difficult device to construct. A greater threat could be a dirty bomb.

Like this post
Forum Editor

Likes # 0

Nobody is going to start a nuclear war over the Israel/Palestine conflict. At the moment the current situation is one of many that have occurred between the two countries over the years. It isn't on the scale of the 2009/10 conflict, but this time it has been made rather more serious by the fact of Israel's assassination of Ahmed Jabari, the leader of Hamas's military wing. That kind of thing isn't quickly forgotten, and the mood in Gaza is one of aggression. It will take a great deal of clever talking to get both sides to agree to, and abide by a cease-fire.

At the moment the whole Middle east region is less stable than it has been for around 50 years. Syria is tearing itself apart, and Lebanon is too involved with Syria to stay out of that. The Egyptian situation has changed drastically since the departure of Mubarak, and Egypt can no longer be relied upon to provide a calming influence - Mubarak's successor is a Hamas supporter, and so is Turkey. Both those countries are going to publicly support a cease fire but the fact of their support for Hamas is going to give that organisation the impetus it needs to continue the fight.

Like this post
kad60

Likes # 0

Surely the most "lethal threat" would come from a biological weapon, the anthrax case in the States and even more so the Aum Shinrikyo case proves that such a singular or cocktail of such agents can be easily hidden and deployed to devestataing effect.

That Saddam,Churchill and the Japs used such weapons does not mean that only leaders are able and willing to use them,there are others in less exalted posistions who,given the opportunity,would be more than willing and able to do so.

An Ebola virus on an unsuspecting population would wreak havoc and terror far above that of todays situation.

Like this post

Reply to this topic

This thread has been locked.



IDG UK Sites

OnePlus Two release date rumours: Something's happening on 22 July

IDG UK Sites

13in MacBook Air review, Apple's MacBook Air 2014 reviewed

IDG UK Sites

5 reasons to buy an electric car and 5 reasons not to

IDG UK Sites

Evernote Skitch: the best way for creatives to doodle feedback