Contact Forum Editor

Send an email to our Forum Editor:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the Forum Editor know who sent the message. Both your name and email address will not be used for any other purpose.

Speakers Corner


It's free to register, to post a question or to start / join a discussion


 

How ridiuclous can you get


Kevscar1

Likes # 0

Evidently they are considering passing a law to ban teenagers carrying passengers who are not part of their family. How many thousands are still driving around texting and talking on their mobile this would be yet another unenforcable law

Like this post
Forum Editor

Likes # 0

woodchip

Peer pressure is certainly a factor, but if the majority of children were provided with a decent set of values by their parents the peer pressure would tend to reinforce those values.

Peer groups will usually consist of people with similar views from similar backgrounds. It's the principle of sameness which bonds peer groups. There will,of course,be people who step outside the moral framework that was provided by their parents and 'go off the rails', but that has always been the case. There will also be people who improve upon the parental values they received as a child, and they'll pass those improvements on to their own children.

It all has to start somewhere,and for all children it starts at home, not in the corridors of power.

Like this post
spuds

Likes # 0

I have not really looked into the article that the originator of this thread opened for discussion, but seeing the title and possible banning makes me more convinced that this is another one of those events that has been given very little thought, especially were enforcement is concerned or required.

'namtas' as also made the remark about " A child learns right from wrong as part of family life it isn't something taught". But what happens when that family life or circle is unstable, and that child sees no difference between right and wrong?.

As a child I was chastised many times for doing wrong, and it sure didn't do me any harm. In fact I gained respect of my elders and other people for showing me the difference in making a true and honest society and possibly making a good member of that society.

Like this post
Bing.alau

Likes # 0

Besides the parents teaching their children the correct way to behave, there should be reinforcement from other groups of people such as teachers in schools and in other groups such as the Scouts etc. Discipline in some form is necessary of course but nowadays teachers are unable to provide it. Parents are unable to provide it. Sending a child to their room is not the answer. How do you get respect from youngsters these days when they see how easy it is to get away with offending others without being disciplined. Setting a good example is not enough in my opinion, but it seems that is what the powers that be think is the answer.

Of course when they grow older and begin to drive cars they either behave correctly in the vehicle, or they get punished the hard way. Death! Too late to teach any form of discipline then isn't it?

Spare the rod and spoil the child sounds like a good old proverb to me. There I go putting the cat among the pigeons again.

Like this post
csqwared

Likes # 0

Bing.alau

...or they get punished the hard way. Death! Too late to teach any form of discipline then isn't it?

Unfortunately, often involving other, innocent, drivers/pedestrians.

I'm wholeheartedly with you on the 'spare the rod theme' but that might be a generation thing (didn't do us any harm) and as you say, a whole other debate.

Like this post
Forum Editor

Likes # 0

The old justification that sparing the rod and spoiling the child not 'didn't do us any harm' crops up whenever the subject of child discipline is discussed, but of course it's nonsense to generalise.

Physical punishment did (and does) a lot of children a great deal of harm. There are plenty of people who beat their children because 'it happened to me, and it didn't do me any harm' without realising that they are themselves as sadistic as their parents were. It harmed them by damaging their characters for life, but they blithely go on, perpetuating the myth that a clip around the ear is good for children. It's not, and never has been - parental violence instils fear into children. Parents who hit their children mistake fear for respect, and the children who learn that parents hit their offspring for every little transgression turn into deceivers; they lie their way out of trouble, and may continue to do it into adulthood.

Every time I hear an adult saying that it's OK to hit a child I know I've heard a bully. It's possible to bring up children to be good, honest, law abiding adults without hitting them.

Like this post
namtas

Likes # 0

Point well made FE

Like this post
Bing.alau

Likes # 0

FE. I would like to point out that my bad tempered father often hit me and my brothers with his belt. But I have never hit my three children. Many a time I wanted to but didn't.

By the way I blame his bad temper on the effects of his experiences during the first World War. I only came to realise this when I had grown up myself and looked back wondering why he was like that.
Like this post
Bing.alau

Likes # 0

I wonder what caused the text to go like that?

Like this post
morddwyd

Likes # 0

"parental violence instils fear into children. Parents who hit their children mistake fear for respect, and the children who learn that parents hit their offspring for every little transgression turn into deceivers; they lie their way out of trouble, and may continue to do it into adulthood."

No it doesn't, it instils respect and the rules of society.

I'm not talking about violent punishment causing injury, but the sort of discipline used in nature. A lion cub which gets a bit rough in play and nips its mother's tail may well get a cuff that will bowl them over, so will a chimp or gorilla "teenager", and there are many other examples in nature, from puppies getting nipped to lambs being butted. It is, literally, natural.

They learn to respect the other members of the peer group, and grow into normal healthy members of their society.

Please don't tell me that is what makes us separate from the animals, because at that age we are not.

As I have said before, children are like puppies, naturally mischievous, and they do need to be trained.

Like this post
spider9

Likes # 0

The problem, as always, is that people don't naturally fit into moulds.

One parent's idea of chastisement may well be a 'loving slap' on the bottom, while another's might be a full fist in the face.

ALL children need protecting from thugs and so if the loving punishment needs outlawing to save others from fear and hurt - then it must be so. No ifs, no buts.

Like this post

Reply to this topic

This thread has been locked.



Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.