Speakers Corner
It's free to register, to post a question or to start / join a discussion
How ridiuclous can you get
« previous 1 2 3 4 5 … next » last »
Likes # 0
Posted November 17, 2012 at 7:41AM
Evidently they are considering passing a law to ban teenagers carrying passengers who are not part of their family. How many thousands are still driving around texting and talking on their mobile this would be yet another unenforcable law
- Tags:
- teannagers
- cars
Likes # 0
Posted November 17, 2012 at 4:01PM
morddwyd *" It's about as stupid as the law which says learner drivers must display L plates and be supervised"*
You say it's a stupid law to make 'learner' drivers display L plates? Do you mean anyone should be able to get in and drive a car without any indication that they have not passed a proficiency test?
As for the point about one person in a car that has L plates - it may be technically wrong for an experienced driver to still have L plates on display - but hardly against the law. How many driving school cars are in that situation when 'between customers' with only the owner in the vehicle?
It wouldn't be a 'moneyspinner' - in the same way one can hardly say the seatbelt law is. Or do you really believe that the only purpose of that law was to gather fines, rather than save lives?
Likes # 0
Posted November 17, 2012 at 4:10PM
Tangalooma_2006: "Most teenagers have their own car these days" - Is that a fact? If so how did they get it? Bought by parents and maintained by them? If they bought it themselves out of their own money then they might take more care.
Something has to be done to reduce the number of young driver deaths. I am not sure that this is the right policy but showing off doesn't help nor does being egged on by possibly under the influence passengers.
Likes # 0
Posted November 17, 2012 at 4:57PM
I'm an avid "petrolhead" & as such,watch lots of programs on TV about cars.They were talking about insurance quotes recently and how fitting of "tracker" type devices that monitored the driving style and relayed it to a website(for instance)could reduce the premium massively.They also visited a "cruise" which had a large number of younger drivers with modified cars and asked whether any of them would consider installing such devices in their cars.There was an almost 100% no response as they didn't wish to be "spied" on as they felt that with the large quantity of CCTV cameras around that was sufficient spying.The question was then asked "how much was their present premium?" and the majority were paying in excess of £3000! Even when the resulting drop in premium to under £900 was pointed out,they still insisted they'd never have such a device installed.I'm just under 50 & baulked at a quote for £1500(I needed business type cover)but had no option but to pay,so how these younger drivers are able to cough out twice that escapes me.I've always maintained that if my premium is more than the value of my car,I'll do without the car(though this is getting harder & harder to achieve as premiums can be ridiculous and my maximum spend on a car has been just £500 for many years)As I've also been the victim of nine crashes now,and the other driver has been under 25 in every instance I wish something could be done to try and get the younger driver to concentrate more before the next crash kills me.As for the police pulling over every car with an apparently younger driver carrying passengers being impracticable,as I once got stopped six times in as many hours for a "routine check" its not that impracticable to achieve,especially with the police now being able to check insurance/MOT/Tax etc through ANPR technology.
Likes # 0
Posted November 17, 2012 at 5:01PM
Fourm member
Earlier you wrote "The young person may pay for the car but the only way they can insure it is for dad to say it is his second car and the youngster is only an irregular user"
I'd just like to point out to everyone that this practice is referred to by insurers as 'fronting' and is illegal.
On a wider note, If anyone is looking for alternative suggestions, well how about a power limitation? It's something that is already practiced with motorcycles. In fact it would probably be quite easy to achieve with modern ECU's. I also believe it was suggestred by one manufacturer (ford? cant' remember) that it might be possible to have a restricted power output depending on which ignition key was used.
Now I know full well that such a scheme would take quite a number of years to take full effect, but you have to start somewhere.
Another possibility might be limiting driving hours to (say) 7am to 7pm.
Neither idea is perfect, and both have their flaws. I can almost hear the 'but what if..' already.
I do think they might go some way to helping though.
WTM
Likes # 0
Posted November 17, 2012 at 5:36PM
How would you reduce this death toll?
No one gets a driving license until they are twenty five. =
Number of cars on road reduced therefore less CO2 emmissions + Death toll reduced.
might also mean we get a better public transport system as more people would be using it.
:0)
Likes # 0
Posted November 17, 2012 at 5:51PM
might also mean we get a better public transport system as more people would be using it
I wouldn't bet on that, if I were you!
WTM
Likes # 0
Posted November 17, 2012 at 5:56PM
Of course this wouldn't happen, as there is noway the government would want to reduce the "cash cow" that is the modern motorist.
WTM
That's one bet I won't take :0)
Likes # 0
Posted November 17, 2012 at 7:21PM
"Do you mean anyone should be able to get in and drive a car without any indication that they have not passed a proficiency test?"
No I did not mean that, and you know I didn't.
No it is not against the law to display L plates if you are a qualified driver (though it is in some countries on the mainland, even for driving school vehicles between pupils. I am, or was, an authorised instructor in one such country and I would have quickly lost my "ticket" if I had driven on L plates), but it does detract from the whole purpose of the plates, to warn other drivers that the person driving is not fully competent and may do something unexpected.
Likes # 0
Posted November 17, 2012 at 7:29PM
fourm member. What do you class as a "Town car"? I own a small VW car and in my opinion, it is as fast and as powerful as any car whether in town or on the motorway. But I think some people would probably class it as a town car or a runaround.
I think they are on the right track by not allowing newly qualified drivers to carry passengers until they get some time under their (seat) belts.
The big whack of insurance premiums doesn't affect their standard of driving, but some sort of speed limiting device and an empty car might concentrate their minds. The age factor may make a difference but only when they have been qualified for a couple of years as well.
In my opinion, a 20 year old passing the test will not be a lot different to an 18 year old, when they venture out on the road without an accompanying driver for the first time.
Likes # 0
Posted November 17, 2012 at 8:28PM
fourm member
It needed pointing out that fronting was actually illegal, but I see your point and agree with it.
Bingalau's point about town cars is a valid one also. I think the way round it may be to have a stated power to weight ration on the registration document. (it actually took some effort to not say log book) Much as we have the emissions catagory now. But for the first year or three possibly 35ish hp/tonne might be a ballpark figure.
WTM
« previous 1 2 3 4 5 … next » last »
Reply to this topic
This thread has been locked.
Check out PC Advisor's other tech forums
Top 5 Most Popular
-
New Xbox One release date, specs, features and price in UK
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Apple iPhone 5 comparison review
-
Galaxy S4 vs BlackBerry Z10 comparison review - which is best, the Samsung or the BlackBerry?
-
Microsoft Windows 8 review
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Nexus 4 smartphone comparison review: what's the best Android?



