Referring to Lance Armstrong I am more interested in his ability to win major bike races after recovering from cancer. Now if he was taking performance enhancing drugs to make this possible why are the medical profession not consulting him on what they were so the rest of us that are recovering from cancer treatment can enjoy the same level of fitness he seemingly does.

My physical condition after recovering from cancer 3 and a half years ago is absolutely rubbish, in fact I joke with the docs that I went from a fit man with cancer to an incredibly unfit without. If there are drugs that will make my quality of life more palatable then I am interested.

Kevscar1

"no mention of boys in anything I've heard or read."

Read the link I posted for Joseph Kerr above.

In the case of the policeman not being believed by his superiors when he told them about it. There probably were documents. But the chance of the police unearthing them now and so implicating higher police officers, is entirely unlikely. The police will tend to cover each other's backs as usual.

I am thinking of the Hillsborough masquerade of course. But who knows if one domino falls over then so might the others.

Condom raises a valid concern and to that I would add the theatre that surrounds some accused's arrival at court. Large motorcade with outriders and a helicopter hovering above.

Hardly gives the appearance of innocent until proven guilty.