We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
Contact Forum Editor

Send an email to our Forum Editor:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the Forum Editor know who sent the message. Both your name and email address will not be used for any other purpose.

Speakers Corner


It's free to register, to post a question or to start / join a discussion


 

whats the problem with kate photos


sunnystaines

Likes # 1

if she runs around topless why complain when photographed, william is looking straight at the camera in one of the photos must have known they were being taken.

most young ladies go topless in the sun so why the fuss.

Like this post
Forum Editor

Likes # 0

I'm surprised that you need to have it explained, but the fuss is because Kate is the wife of the heir to the throne, and most young ladies are not.

She is entitled not to have topless photographs of her that were taken on private property sold to the highest bidder for publication.

The invasion of privacy issue seems clear cut to me, and I predict that William and Kate will receive an offer to settle out of court. The magazine concerned behaved disgracefully, but it's run by Silvio Berlusconi's holding company, so I guess it would be wrong to expect normal standards of press restraint.

Like this post
Joseph Kerr

Likes # 1

I haven't seen the picture fo which you speak, but what are you implying exactly?

On another but related note, there seems to be lots of dissaproval because of who she is. It seems to me that we should dissaprove of this kind of thing or not, regardless of who it happens to.

Like this post
Chegs ®™

Likes # 0

I've searched the internet for these pictures,& they all seem to have vanished so I think someone's now panicking that this invasion of her privacy could cost them dearly.I did find some pictures of her before removing her top,& they are grainy.I also found various captions linked to these pictures stating they'd been taken with a very long ranged telephoto lens hense the grainy images,so I can see why William didn't see the photographer.I also think that if Kate is naive enough to think that sunbathing topless wont attract the gutter press to take extraordinary measures to get pictures,she needs to talk to her security people more as I'm sure they'll reveal some of the press antics they've foiled.Kate is a very beautiful woman,and shouldn't worry unduly that people are interested in seeing pictures of her topless.Kate is also a celebrity,and therefore will find that the media are everywhere.Many other celebrities have been photographed in revealing clothing.This latest generation of Royals appear to view nudity as normal,and only after their images have been revealed to the world does any dissent appear.

Like this post
sunnystaines

Likes # 0

then she should not go topless if overlooked.

Like this post
Bing.alau

Likes # 0

Don't forget that it was this kind of thing which drove Diana to distraction. No wonder her son William intends to sue them.

If these photographers want to take pictures of topless women, there's lots of places they can find them. But invading people's privacy by using camera's capable of taking pictures from thousands of yards away is criminal.

Like this post
morddwyd

Likes # 0

"then she should not go topless if overlooked."

A bit harsh.

It is voyeurism (for that is what thus is) which is illegal, not relaxing in your own private grounds.

Like this post
WhiteTruckMan

Likes # 0

Were it me I would not accept an out of court settlement. I would push for punitive damages. I heard today that the french are supposed to have some seriously tough privacy laws. But such laws are meaningless when the publications have a budget for just such eventualities. The proprietors and editor(s) should be made to realise that fines and reparations are not merely the cost of doing buisness.

WTM

Like this post
Grey Goo

Likes # 0

Lucky it wasn't a Psycho with a Barratt sniper rifle.

Like this post
interzone55

Likes # 0

sunnystaines

It's hardly overlooked, got to be nearly half a mile to the nearest proper road, and there's no buildings for miles around

Google Maps

Like this post
Jock1e

Likes # 0

[ the french are supposed to have some seriously tough privacy laws]

Not so sure about that.Their last prime ministers wife had nude photos of her shown on the Internet.

So I would imagine they would be rather lenient to those that produce photos like that.

But then again I never heard of any court cases about it when it happened.

Mind you the photographs were taken long before she was married.

Like this post

Reply to this topic

This thread has been locked.



IDG UK Sites

Android One vs Android Silver vs Google Nexus: What is the difference?

IDG UK Sites

Apple updates MacBook Pro line-up: Price cuts & spec boosts for 6 MacBook Pro models

IDG UK Sites

Long live the internet fridge: the Internet of Things is coming

IDG UK Sites

How Prometheus' colourist Juan Ignacio Cabrera gave a tense, edgy feel to Chosen