Speakers Corner
It's free to register, to post a question or to start / join a discussion
BAe Merger
Likes # 0
Posted September 13, 2012 at 9:53PM
Anyone else having misgivings about the possible merger of BAe and EADS?
I know size is now everything to compete on world markets, but although it's a merger it surely cannot be good for British industry?
EADS is the bigger partner and BAe could be inexorably subsumed.
The French have an enviable record in looking after French jobs.
- Tags:
- bae
Likes # 0
Posted October 7, 2012 at 5:40PM
My first year at college was spent at the huts under the bridge then Highbury in Cosham that was a lot closer to home as I lived in Pauslgrove. I was working for VT Shipbulding whe we were bought out by BAE
Likes # 0
Posted October 7, 2012 at 5:52PM
With respect to morddwyd , I don't wish to hijack your post, but if you will allow my indulgence to reply to Strawballs I would be grateful.
Strawballs , I remember distinctly that Vosper were the first to trial a GRP hull as a minesweeper boat. The first prototype had a hull that was two inches thick in some places. Being young and dumb at the time I didn't follow through with news of the success or not. If I remember correctly they had two vessels that were on trial. Do you know, or remember anything of this?
Likes # 0
Likes # 0
Likes # 0
Posted October 7, 2012 at 7:51PM
"With respect to morddwyd , I don't wish to hijack your post"
Not at all.
Regularly used to visit Marconi at Brown's Lane during my torpedo development days!
Likes # 0
Posted October 8, 2012 at 10:19AM
FE It may be possible to get an assurance on jobs and security from EADS and the French and German governments. However, the UK government will be powerless to ensure that these undertakings are met. Think of Kraft and Cadburys.
Likes # 0
Posted October 8, 2012 at 11:39AM
The largest investor in BAE has stated that it has significant reservations about the merger BBC News
Likes # 0
Posted October 8, 2012 at 12:29PM
"The difficulty the merger talks are said to be in is over the 'golden' shares for the various governments."
More precisely, our government wants Germany and France to reduce their shareholding in the merged company to a level that would preclude either of them from having the ability to control the business.
Our government has a 'golden share' in BAE, and has said it will use its power of veto to block the entire deal if Germany and France don't comply. A further requirement is that the defence division of the merged business must be based in the UK. Germany and France would probably agree to that condition.
Likes # 1
Posted October 8, 2012 at 3:50PM
I believe that the UK government wishes the other two to reduce their holdings to 9% each. The golden share would no longer exist after the merger. With the combined government holdings and other continental holdings, the merged company can do as it likes, just as Kraft did with Cadburys despite the assurances given only three weeks earlier.
Sadly I feel that there is too much evidence that the French cannot be trusted and the merger is far too risky from the UK standpoint.
Likes # 1
Posted October 8, 2012 at 8:11PM
"there is too much evidence that the French cannot be trusted "
Totally untrue and unjustified.
You can rely implicitly, without any qualms, on the French to do what is right for France and the French.
Wish we had a government like that (and I don't just mean the present one, either!).
Reply to this topic
This thread has been locked.
Check out PC Advisor's other tech forums
Top 5 Most Popular
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Apple iPhone 5 comparison review
-
Best cases and covers for the new iPad: protect your tablet in style
-
What’s the best mobile OS: iOS, Android, Windows Phone 8 or BlackBerry 10?
-
Galaxy S4 vs BlackBerry Z10 comparison review - which is best, the Samsung or the BlackBerry?
-
Microsoft Surface Pro gets May UK release date and price



