Contact Forum Editor

Send an email to our Forum Editor:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the Forum Editor know who sent the message. Both your name and email address will not be used for any other purpose.

Speakers Corner


It's free to register, to post a question or to start / join a discussion


 

the horror of statins


Likes # 0

now they want everyone to take them without weighing up the side affects

statins

[No thakns To Statins2

Like this post

Likes # 0

My wife takes them, I declined. We shall see who has the last laugh.

Like this post

Likes # 0

"now they want everyone to take them without weighing up the side affects"

No they don't, and the side effects are well known - get your facts right.

Numerous research studies have shown that the benefits of taking statins far outweigh the potential risks. Using emotive phrases such as "the horror of statins" is silly, and unhelpful. It's true that there can be side effects, but that's true of every single drug on the market, so it's best to get a sense of perspective.

The two serious potential side effects with statins are liver toxicity and myopathy. Both of these complications are rare. Liver toxicity can occur if someone is taking a very high dose of statins or takes them in combination with acetaminophen or alcohol.

Myopathy (muscle weakness) may occur when taking statins alone, but the risk increases when statins are taken along with vitamin B3, or with a fibrate (a Cholesterol-lowering drug). Myopathy can have serious consequences if left untreated.

Both side effects are rare, and as I said earlier the risks are far outweighed by the benefits of taking statins.

Claiming that "our GP's are making money as well as the pharmacies and poisoning us with their drugs" is a wildly sweeping and inaccurate thing to do.

Like this post

Likes # 0

It's not the medicine I don't trust, it's the statistics. If everyone took them, regardless of whether they were at risk of heart disease, some people would have their lives extended, some would have their lives cut short. If I was one of the unlucky ones, it would be no consolation to me to know that my early death meant two other people were going to live longer. I'll take my chances with healthy eating and exercise.

For every 10,000 women treated with statins:

271 fewer cases of cardiovascular disease.

8 fewer cases of oesophageal cancer.

23 extra patients with acute kidney failure.

73 extra patients with liver dysfunction.

307 extra patients with cataracts.

39 extra patients with muscle weakness.

Figures were similar for men, except there would be 110 extra cases of muscle weakness.

Like this post

Likes # 0

One side effect of the statin I take is on my arthritis.

In the period before my heart attack I could barely walk.

Now, nine years on, I can climb stairs, albeit slowly, but I can still do it.

Like this post

Likes # 0

Surely the reason such medicines are prescription items is because of the individual risks involved. If this is so, I would have thought that each person should be assessed by their GP as to need and dosage - as with any other such medicine. How would this affect an already overloaded surgery?

Like this post
BT

Likes # 0

..the reason such medicines are prescription items..

In actual fact some Low dose Statins were reclassified and have been available over the counter in Pharmacies since 2004

BMJ extract

Like this post

Likes # 0

Once knew some who tucked ito fatty greasy bacon butties evermorning, then had a TIA also high colestrol. the fatty bacon butties stopped then a short while latter they appeared again, i asked why? he said its alright i am on satins now i can eat what i want again.

Like this post

Likes # 0

fourm member

From here

Like this post

Likes # 0

Well if they suit you good luck. I took Lipitor for some months and after my Blood platelets went south and had a nice pair of purple polka dot legs I stopped taking them. It has taken a few years and a lot of Q10 to restore the status quo. GP offered alternates to Lipitor but I have declined.

Like this post

Likes # 0

Recently the Daily Mail, (oops! the mention might stir some blood on here), published a story that taking statins could reduce the possibility of bowel cancer occurring by as much as 50%. This seemed good news in considering whether statins are good bad or indifferent.

Problem is, this week the Mail produced another story, snoring could increase the risk of cancer. Now there's something else to consider in relation to statins.

Like this post

Reply to this topic

This thread has been locked.



Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.