We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
Contact Forum Editor

Send an email to our Forum Editor:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the Forum Editor know who sent the message. Both your name and email address will not be used for any other purpose.

Speakers Corner


It's free to register, to post a question or to start / join a discussion


 

HMS Victory to be raised


Bingalau
Resolved

Likes # 0

Having stumbled upon this article on the BBC news site. I started wondering about the row kicked up about the Royal Navy ships which were sunk by the Japanese off Malaya, (HMS Prince of Wales being one of them). The row was about unauthorised divers stealing the ship's propellers etc, thereby desecrating a War Grave, for scrap value. When does a ship stop being a "War Grave" if it ever stops at all?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16671444

Like this post
bremner

Likes # 0

An explanation of the Act covering war graves Military Remains Act

Like this post
Forum Editor

Likes # 0

When does a ship stop being a "War Grave" if it ever stops at all?

I wasn't aware that the Victory was an official war grave - she went down in a storm as she was on her way home from escorting a convoy in the Mediterranean.

As far as war graves are concerned, I have no idea about how long the designation lasts. In truth I imagine that war graves are war graves for as long as they last, or for as long as anyone can be bothered to remember them. It might be argued that the Mary Rose should have been a war grave - she was certainly being prepared for active service when she went down - but that didn't stop us lifting her and all she contained from the bottom.

What beckons as far as the Victory is concerned is the £500 million pounds worth of gold (at today's prices) she was estimated to have been carrying.

Like this post
WhiteTruckMan

Likes # 0

An even simpler point of view is this: war grave or not, under international law a sunken warship remains the property of it's nation.

WTM

Like this post
Forum Editor

Likes # 0

"under international law a sunken warship remains the property of it's nation."

Indeed it does, but that nation's government can sanction the salvage of such a ship by a company from another nation, and that's what has happened in this case. The Victory will be salvaged by an American company, but the work will be managed by the Maritime Heritage Foundation.

The Ministry of Defence has welcomed the project.

Under international salvage laws the American company will get the lion's share of any recovered treasure.

Like this post
Woolwell

Likes # 0

Around UK wrecks are protected by 2 acts - Protection of Wrecks Act 1973 and the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986. This page Receiver of wrecks gives details and the bottom of the page are links to the list of protected wrecks. I found the list very interesting and includes the Falklands War.

Like this post  
john bunyan

Likes # 0

I read this about the original Victory in the Sunday Times todar. The cannons etc seem ok but it seems little of the hull remains. The ST link does not work but hopefully this does.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jan/22/first-hms-victory-raise-us?newsfeed=true

Like this post
Bingalau

Likes # 0

I imagine the gold is in the vicinity of the wreck of course.

John Bunyan. a different subject entirely but, did you read the account of the salvaging of the gold off HMS Edinbugh? I've got a funny feeling that you did.

I suppose now that divers are going deeper than ever and machines can do the necessary work anyway, that lots of other ships are going to be found and "plundered"? Wrong word I suppose but it sounds right to me.

Like this post
Condom

Likes # 0

What is there left to salvage except the gold and some cannon and probably the lump of iron which would have been used as ballast. The rest will have rotted away years ago. This is not like the Mary Rose as what was saved of it was because of the deep estuary mud.

Like this post
WhiteTruckMan

Likes # 0

When I commented about a warship being the property of its nation, I had in mind bingalau's comment about unauthorised divers etc.

WTM

Like this post
Forum Editor

Likes # 0

Bingalau

I'm not sure it's right to describe the recovery of gold from a 300 year old wreck as plundering, any more than it would be right to use the same word to describe routine salvage work.

The gold is there, and is being recovered with the sanction of the government which has jurisdiction over the wreck. It's being done legally in other words.

Like this post

Reply to this topic

This thread has been locked.



IDG UK Sites

Windows 9 release date, price, features: Videos leak as Microsoft sets 30 September unveiling

IDG UK Sites

Why local multiplayer gaming is rapidly vanishing: we look at the demise of split-screen and LAN...

IDG UK Sites

IBC 2014 news: video post, CG and VFX news from Adobe, Blackmagic, Eyeon and more

IDG UK Sites

Retina MacBook Air release date rumours and specs: Gold 12in Retina MacBook Air almost 1cm thinner...