What's mind boggling to me is, that, most neutrinos coming from the Sun, pass right through planet Earth,as if it wasn't there.

It is very interesting and still may cause a bit of a rewrite of our beliefs, but as morddwyd says it would be helpful to have a level of independent corroboration. Problem being there is only one of these machines so presumably any repeat testing will have that question mark hanging over any result.

"As neutrinos are so tiny and have no charge, I wonder if, even if the results are confirmed, just how much E = MC2 will need to be modified?"

I don't understand the relationship between the size of a neutrino, it's charge (or lack thereof) and E=Mc^2. Can you explain?

OTT_B Not being a person trained in quantum physics, no! I hoped someone with such knowledge would comment. It is difficult to grasp the implications , but it is difficult to believe that so much work has seemed to confirm Einstein was correct. Unlike the suggestion that a "Higgs Boson" particle ought to exist to explain anomalies re mass, no one seems to have suggested a similar anomaly in the speed of light issue. Surely observations of the arrival of neutrinos and light from a supernova would have shown this phenomenon? Suggestions based on other dimansions being involved are also difficult to grasp!!

Albert's brain was cut into a thousand little pieces, (when he was dead), and put into jar's for mementos....just wait...'till he come's back in the future...to reprove his Theory of Special Relativity. "Vere.. is my brain, got dammit...I left it here a century ago?"