In law this lady committed murder. She carefully planned what she was going to do and then having previously failed in an attempt killed her son.
She was correctly convicted, I just despair at what the two jurors who did not convict were thinking about. They clearly ignored the evidence and let their heart overrule their heads.
The question is whether the lady deserved a 9 year sentence or whether the judge could have shown greater understanding of the pressures that led her to this terrible action.
We do not know sufficient detail of the case to really give an informed opinion. I just hope none of us are in the same position and have to consider the same action.