Ignore "Not again" - wrong link

  laurie53 09:16 04 Jun 07


  Jackcoms 10:35 04 Jun 07

Wouldn't it have been more sensible to post your "ignore" warning in the original thread?

And do you plan to give us the correct link?

  Totally-braindead 10:38 04 Jun 07

Brilliant laurie53 as Jackcoms has said I have no idea of what on earth you are on about as I never saw the thread you refer too. I'm sure others will be in the same boat.
Think about it from my point of view. I haven't seen whatever you refer to so this means nothing.

  GANDALF <|:-)> 11:18 04 Jun 07

click here is the link.

  knockin on 11:56 04 Jun 07

Thanks Gandalf, but I'm ignoring it.

  laurie53 20:09 04 Jun 07

Sorry about the confusion everybody.

I couldn't hack the link no matter what I tried, so thought I wouls try to save people clicking on a useless thread!

That's why I didn't put the "ignore" in the original thread.

I guess the FE deleted the original thread.

Thanks for putting the link in for me Gandalf.

Must try harder!


  Forum Editor 20:30 04 Jun 07

and commonsense backward.

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.

Surface Pro (2017) vs Surface Pro 4

20 groundbreaking 3D animation technologies coming to Siggraph 2017

iPad Pro 12.9 vs Surface Pro 5