Looking at the comparison between the 2 groups, there is only an 8 year 'age-range' in one group against a 19 year 'age-range' in the other.
Is it not reasonable for the latter group to have the much larger number ... or am I missing something?
This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.
Windows 10 review: Why the new Start menu, Edge browser, new apps and Cortana make Windows 10 the…
1995-2015: How technology has changed the world in 20 years
Help Dan Rubin curate galleries of Adobe Stock images – and you could win a year's Creative Cloud
iPhone 6c release date rumours and images | Expect iPhone 6c to be Apple Pay ready