Memory Timings ?

  Bleep 15:38 01 Jan 05
Locked

Hello I’ve been over-clocking for the first time and have seen my Memory timings change from:


CAS Latency (tCL): 2 clocks @133 MHz, 2.5 clocks @166 MHz
RAS to CAS (tRCD): 3 clocks @133 MHz, 3 clocks @166 MHz
RAS Precharge (tRP): 3 clocks @133 MHz, 3 clocks @166 MHz
Cycle Time (tRAS): 6 clocks @133 MHz, 7 clocks @166 MHz


Over-clocking Settings


(ASUS A7N8X-X - NFORCE 2
AMD 2500 Baton @ 1980MHz 180MHz FSB - Temp 34 Idol - 43 Full Load
2 X 512MB PC2700 Crucial - Micron Ram Single Channel Mode)


To:


Frequency: 180 MHz
FSB/DRAM Multiplier: 1/1x
Channels: Single
ECC Diagnostic: No
CAS Latency (tCL): 3 clocks @ 180MHz
RAS to CAS (tRCD): 4 clocks @ 180MHz
RAS Precharge (tRP): 4 clocks @ 180Mhz
Cycle Time (tRAS): 8 clocks @ 180Mhz


Are these new timings above, Ok or should I alter them?


Thanks in advance.

  LinuxPenguin 17:51 01 Jan 05

i wouldnt go voerclocking memory, can be dangerous, but if you insist get some heatsinks for them, ebuyer do some good ones

  Bleep 19:10 01 Jan 05

The system is stable and running happily @ 2000MHz / 181MHz FSB.


GPU PNY 6800 GT 256MB @ 400/1.1GHz


It just been through Sandra burn-in and 5 hours of Farcry @ Ultra High settings 2XAA 2XAF, with not one pause or crash.


I'm just trying to find out wether CAS Latency 2 changing to CAS Latency 3 is an improvement or loss in memory performance timings.

  LinuxPenguin 20:37 01 Jan 05

loss


lower CAs is better

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.

Best phone camera 2016/2017: Galaxy S7 vs iPhone 7 vs Google Pixel vs HTC 10 Evo vs OnePlus 3T vs…

1995-2015: How technology has changed the world in 20 years

The Pantone Colour of the Year 2017 is Green

Super Mario Run preview | Hands-on first impressions of Super Mario Run: Mario's iPhone & iPad…