Nintendo Switch review: Hands-on with the intuitive modular console and its disappointing games…
Which would be best for gaming, would it play bf2 easily?
AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core 4200+ with HT Tech.
1024MB DDR400 Memory - PC3200 (2x512)
256MB nVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX - TV-Out + DVI - PCI-Express
Intel® Pentium® Processor 940 w/ Dual Core Technology 3.2GHz 800MHz FSB
2GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 533MHz - 4 x 512MB
256MB PCI-Express x16 NVIDIA® GeForce™ 7800 GTX
Is the 2gb ram going to make a huge difference?
where 2GB ram makes a difference. Go for the AMD and add a Gig of ram later if you need it.
Im buying it in a package and it costs 75 Pounds is it worth it?
Some games do demand more system RAM to handle textures etc. I believe BF2 is one of those that runs much smoother with 2 Gb RAM + especially Multiplayer.
"I lowered the AA setting to 4AA hoping to lower the RAM usage, but it is still over ~1.1GB on a server with just me running around on it. I am sure that 1.2GB+ will be hit quite often during a battle with 50+ players."
This site blames possible Memory Leakage though....
"The game has a serious memory leak on some systems. I personally experienced peak memory usage of a whopping 1.4GB (Ed: And people say we're crazy using 2 GB of RAM)."
Is it worth it for an extra 1 gig? Well cost wise good quality memory is about that, I was £69 for 1 gig about a month ago, do you need it is a different question. I would say no its not essential but some people seem to be saying that 2 gig is better for BF2 and it will certainly run without it. What I would do is get the 1 gig only but make sure it has 2 memory slots free for further updates then if you do decide you want it go here and get it click here
I think you'll find when the quote is referring to 50+ users it is talking about a game server's memory.
Your PC if it has a decent graphics card I don't think will be using main memory to store textures - that's what graphics memory is for surely? I could be wrong on that.
I've got 1GB and there isn't a game I can't run with everything on full.
Fair enough - I'll admit that i didn't read the thread very closely but it was similar to one i read before.
I did say textures - i meant maps.
as the author of BF2 / SF Ram Usage guide linked to in this thread - click here
i wanted to point out to silverous that in response to "I think you'll find when the quote is referring to 50+ users it is talking about a game server's memory." i am strictly referring to a client machine and not the server rig. if you log onto an empty server and look at your total ram usage, then log onto a server with the same map of the same size with the only difference being that it is populated you will see that your client machine does require more ram. the reason i specified this is because i run some tests on my own dedicated server that i am connected to via a 100Mb/s switch.
just wanted to clear this up.
also the resolution needs to be quantified when saying "I've got 1GB and there isn't a game I can't run with everything on full."
and for the record, in my experience changning texture quality does make a difference on how much total computer ram is used, at least with cards up to 256MB, maybe 7800GTX 512MB takes care of this but i don't know as i have not tested one of those.
also, glad the article helps people out ;)
why not go with a x2 3800 or opteron 165 and 2GB, or if money is an issue get 1x1GB stick now and then add another 1GB stick later. the amd memory controller doesn't really like 4 sticks of ram and the difference you would get by running 1x1GB stick in single channel mode is not that great.
This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.