Huawei P10 review
Not quite the subject of the current poll but:
"EMAIL SNOOPERS MAY FACE COURT
Employers could face prosecution if they snoop on workers' emails and telephone calls without their knowledge, the Government has warned.
Intrusive monitoring must be justified and in almost all cases staff have to be informed, advice from Information Commissioner Richard Thomas says.
The Employment Practices Data Protection Code says employers should comply with the Data Protection Act."
From Teletext News. 11 June 2003
You're welcome. It's on Ceefax as well.
Thats intresting, most employers do this aswell.
The problem with most of the people who use spy ware is that if they aren't bothered about the privacy of their staff, their aren't bothered about the law.
OK but, it gives the employee a better insight into the law and what may be done if this snooping is going on in the workplace.
My employer monitors internal and external emails but as they have advised all staff of this by email (which had to be replied to confirming acceptance) and regularly post email rules on the internal website I assume they would not be in breach of the DPA.
don't see what the problem is, at work we all have it written into our contracts that company e-mail is to be used for company business ONLY, any/all may be read at any time and any voilation will result in " a word with the governor" it is also company policy that all e-mails are scanned for swear words and certain trigger words, at the same time all logs of websites visited are monitored and anyone found visiting porn/recruitment sites/warez etc had better have a good excuse ready!!! as we have all read and signed this contract (therefore accepting it) we can hardly moan when we breach it. As for telephone calls, we work in a small enough enviroment that if we are calling auntie doris in aus everyone will soon know anyway!!!
interesting that thet effectively stop you from accessing recruitment sites - a bit cheeky in some ways. "You will never leave us!"
Many years ago (well befor the internet, even fax) I worked in a government funded research station. All the trade an professional journal in the library there were all at least six months out of date so that any jobs would have been well gone.
Trying to carry out research relying on out of date information is not easy!;-))
At my place of work, I am the adminstrator and all employees and visitors to our two centres are verbaly told of the restrictions of both email and Internet use. This is when they either start as an employee or as a member of a centre. We also have the Computer misuse act and an Acceptable use policy displayed. I can monitor any emails whether they are incoming or outgoing if I so wished plus any Interner sites. In my time working here I have only had to implement this monitoring once, the result was an exclusion on a member from using the systems in either of our centres.
To the poll, at home my children use the Internet most days and I have only had to question one of my sons once over his Internet usage. This was done without having to use any extra utility for snooping. As for my wife, she doesn't know enough to go surfing or even send an email.
My answer would have to be yes to monitoring but only for security reasons.
This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.