Samsung's new flagship phone, the Samsung Galaxy Note II, became available yesterday. Hardware.Info put Samsung's latest Android device next to Apple's iPhone 5 to find out how the current top-of-the-line smartphones compare to each other. Samsung is positioning the Galaxy Note II above the Samsung Galaxy S3.
We put Samsung's latest Android device next to Apple's iPhone 5 to find out how the current top-of-the-line smartphones compare to each other
They both have the same quad-core Exynos 4412 processor, but in the Note II it runs at 1600 MHz instead of 1400 MHz. The GPU has also been boosted from 400 to 533 MHz, and the RAM was increased from 1 GB to 2 GB. These hardware improvements should provide a noticeable performance-increase.
It's still too early for a full review, but it is interesting to find out how the Samsung Galaxy Note II compares to Apple's new iPhone 5. It's challenging to compare the two since they run on two different operating systems, but a number of benchmark programs are available for both Android and iOS. Hardware.Info created a benchmark comparison between the two phones.
So here they are, the cold, hard numbers behind Samsung's and Apple's latest pride and joy. Hardware.Info took a look at the performance of the browsers, 3D rendering, and the performance of the processors and memory. To see the benchmark results, head over to the article on Hardware.Info.
Comments
K9in said: oh my god lol congenitally clueless
Cybernlade18 said: Nobly said
Jack said: Actually it is anything but clear Extremely poor journalism to state things in such a misleading manner
J2innet said: Guys what is this Compare 4 and 55 You even keep this 55 in your jeans
Techiexp1969 said: Can you even read The writer said both the GSM3 and the Note II have the same CPUBrain dead troll
Willycocker said: Dear iTards Get an Android
Jody said: LOL Uh The Iphone 5 does not have aquad-core Exynos 4412 processor It has the A6 chip processor
Christie said: Whoever wrote this article has no idea what theyre talking about LOL
Aeras001 said: One of your stats is wrong Ill let you do the research and see if you can figure it out